SUMMARY OF THE STORY
If you don't have access to the 2024 blacklist scripts email me.
How to Save a Marriage starts with a bang—literally. A grisly crime scene: two bodies, blood everywhere, and a cop muttering, “What a mess.” The hook? One of the victims is Jake, and his wife Emma is also seemingly dead... but the film immediately rewinds to show us how a suffocating marriage spiraled into murder, betrayal, and something even more twisted—body-swapping. Yes, body-swapping.
Jake and Emma’s marriage is a slow-motion car crash: loveless sex, passive-aggressive breakfasts, and a constant undercurrent of resentment. Enter James, Emma’s charismatic boss, and Kate, Jake’s former flame. Infidelity is on the table, but this isn’t just another domestic drama. When a hulking “expert” named Bull offers a mystical potion that lets people switch bodies, Emma and Jake see it as a twisted solution to their failing marriage.
What follows is a dark, chaotic ride where Emma becomes Jake, Jake becomes Emma, and murder becomes the only way out. Pregnancies complicate things. Love turns into manipulation. And ultimately, Emma (in Jake’s body) hatches a plan for permanent escape. In the end, it’s Kate—now in Emma’s body—who survives the carnage, pregnant and finally free, smiling out at the world with a fresh start while everyone else lies dead or broken.
CHARACTER ANALYSIS
JAKE:
Jake starts off as a typical “beta” husband—passive, emasculated, and clinging to a marriage that’s already on life support. His academic demeanor and weak spine make him relatable, but not particularly likable. What works? His vulnerability. What doesn’t? His lack of agency for most of the story. His transformation (both literal and emotional) when trapped in Emma’s body gives him more edge, but it takes too long for him to actively drive the plot.
EMMA:
Emma is the alpha. She’s sharp, ambitious, and increasingly ruthless. What works? Emma’s complexity—she’s not just a one-dimensional “bossy wife.” She’s desperate, manipulative, but also oddly sympathetic at times. What needs improvement? Her arc feels rushed. Her descent into full-blown sociopathy is fascinating but needs more groundwork. The audience needs more empathy for her before she becomes a villain, or she risks feeling like a caricature.
BULL:
The mystical body-swapper with a sinister edge. He’s memorable but underutilized. His motivations are vague, and while his presence adds a surreal element, we never really feel his menace after the initial swap. Developing his backstory or making him a recurring threat would add weight.
KATE:
The unexpected final girl. Her initial role feels secondary, but her survival twist is compelling. What works? Her transformation from Jake’s fleeting obsession to the ultimate survivor is satisfying. What could be improved? We need more reason to root for her throughout the film, not just in the final act.
STORY STRUCTURE ANALYSIS
What Works:
The non-linear timeline is a strength. Starting at the bloody aftermath hooks the audience, and the rewind to the seemingly mundane marriage creates suspense. The midpoint body-swap twist is bold and unexpected. The stakes escalate well, and the climax is brutal and memorable.
What Needs Improvement:
Pacing is an issue. The first act meanders too long in mundane marital woes before the real hook—the body swap—kicks in. Trim down the setup. Get to the inciting incident faster. The final act, while shocking, feels slightly convoluted with too many twists in quick succession. Simplifying the endgame would give the climax more punch.
DIALOGUE ANALYSIS
What Works:
The dialogue is sharp and often darkly funny. Emma’s cutting remarks, Jake’s awkwardness, and Bull’s eerie minimalism stand out.
What Needs Improvement:
Exposition creeps in, especially when explaining the body swap rules. A little ambiguity could go a long way. Some of the more intense arguments rely too much on shouting and repetition—finding subtler, more cutting ways for characters to hurt each other would add depth.
STORY ENGINES ANALYSIS
GOALS (Open vs Closed):
The initial goal is open-ended—can this marriage be saved? But after the body swap, it becomes more closed: survive, switch back, or escape. What works? The shift keeps the narrative fresh. What could improve? Establish Jake’s goal earlier. Is he trying to save the marriage, escape Emma, or something else?
STAKES:
High stakes? Absolutely. Lives are on the line. What needs work? We need more emotional stakes early on. Why does Jake stay with Emma? Why does Emma want out? Make us feel the why.
URGENCY:
The ticking clock of pregnancy adds urgency later, but the first half lacks it. Introduce a looming threat sooner.
MYSTERY:
Who lives? Who dies? The initial crime scene sets this up well, but the mystery fizzles in the middle. Keep us guessing more.
EMPATHY ANALYSIS
ACTIVE VS PASSIVE POSITIVE EMPATHY:
We empathize with Jake’s initial helplessness and Emma’s dissatisfaction, but both characters spend too much time reacting rather than acting. Show Jake actively trying to fix things earlier, and give Emma a moment of genuine vulnerability that isn’t clouded by manipulation.
ACTIVE VS PASSIVE NEGATIVE EMPATHY:
Emma’s descent into villainy is active and gripping, but Jake’s passivity makes it harder to root for him until the end. Let him actively confront Emma sooner, and not just when his back is against the wall.
COMMERCIAL VIABILITY ANALYSIS
This film’s dark, twisted tone puts it in the vein of Gone Girl, The Gift, and The Invisible Man—all financially successful psychological thrillers with mid-range budgets. But body-swapping with this level of brutality is more niche. Films like Possessor (2020) tackled body hijacking with critical acclaim but modest box office returns. Leaning into the psychological thriller market while emphasizing the unique body-swap hook could attract audiences, but marketing will be key.
Bottom line: How to Save a Marriage has potential. But it needs sharper pacing, more empathetic leads, and a tighter third act to avoid being another “ambitious but flawed” thriller.
STORY NOTES
I’m a professional, working screenwriter/director/producer.
I have worked with Morgan Freeman (The Shawshank Redemption), Harvey Keitel (Pulp Fiction), Olga Kurylenko (Quantum Of Solace), Matt Doran (The Matrix).
Unlike many other script-doctor services, the notes I provide are in-depth and comprehensive, often running to ten pages, ensuring every aspect of your story is analyzed.
What you get…
- Page Read Notes. These are beat specific notes that arise as I read your script. These focus on the minutiae of your story as it unfolds.
- General Notes. These focus on all the key aspects of your screenplay, being: Concept, Form, Characters, Dialogue, Hero, Antagonist, Voice, Production, Hero’s Journey, Goal, Stakes, Urgency.
- A one hour Zoom call to go over the notes and answer all your questions before you begin your deep dive into your next draft.
- Lastly, I offer indefinite email follow up. Feel free to email any questions that arise as you rewrite your screenplay. It’s always great to have an objective sounding board to bounce ideas off.
Email samuelb888@gmail.com to take your story to the next level.
All the very best with your writing journey!
No comments:
Post a Comment